Cant really compare 750 twin with 300 single small engine needs to rev to make power and torque .

pikey wrote:Cant really compare 750 twin with 300 single small engine needs to rev to make power and torque .

Yes, I suppose if you had a 350 single with the same red line what sort of cruising speed and top speed would we be talking about for a roadster say? 70mph top speed with a practical cruising speed of 60? What would the fuel consumption be? What was the fuel consumption of an old British 350 single?

Enfield 350 makes max torque at 4000 and max power at 5250 20 bhp .

pikey wrote:Enfield 350 makes max torque at 4000 and max power at 5250 20 bhp .

Ah yes of course I forgot about RE... In fact isn't the newer unit construction engine around 27bhp?

I dont know but give me a small modern revvy engine anyday

My previous Nc700X averaged 75mpg with a best of 79.4mpg.
Amazing economy considering I never spared the Horses
Good to hear the 750 is as economical, could be my next scoot.......

Andy

Normsthename wrote:My previous Nc700X averaged 75mpg with a best of 79.4mpg.
Amazing economy considering I never spared the Horses
Good to hear the 750 is as economical, could be my next scoot.......

Andy

Well the 750 is definitely a more gutsy machine while still holding on to the NCS reputation for economy...

Well the 750 is definitely a more gutsy machine while still holding on to the NCS reputation for economy...

I had a test ride on a 700 Integra last week.
Was quite impressed but decided if I did go for the bike it will be the 750

Andy

I remember riding Triumph Tiger 750 twins back in my army days.
They were pretty similar in power, torque, rpm and mpg to this "revolutionary" Honda idea....

Not quite the same comparison.....
Try and get a Triumph Tiger 750 through the Euro3 emissions

Andy