Motor trade




. I work for a large component manufacturing company , you'll have seen stuff I've specced, project managed, sold under various commercial chassis. Not as reputable as Arthur Daley

.
Capitano is correct but with some problematic caveats.
A car is a car. A motorcycle is a consumer product like a fridge and a CV is an industrial item.
Newer legislation like UN ECE R155 and R156 are very useful if you want to restrict the market.
The right to repair lobby is a joke. Split between commercial entities who really want to act like manufacturers and hobbyists. All have failed to engage the anti-vehicle green factions.
As a manufacturer who desperately wants to be Apple and do passenger seat use subscriptions (only β¬9.99 a month SSSssssir ) you can talk to different lawyers.
The Japanese lawyer will tell you to stick to the spirit of the car legislation. You will avoid eventually meeting a professional footballer with enough money to kick your @Β£$β¬ in court over an engine they blew up. That precedent on top of comparison with far better US law would hurt. Deal with each claim according to the chances of losing, what budget is left etc.
A Bavarian or Hinckley lawyer will tell you to go for it. Use GDPR and R155/156 to lock everything. Code components to a central database "for the consumers protection". Tell anyone who complains that you'll see them in various courts between now and 2047, they should check their pockets for depth.
The success of a warranty claim is very much down to how you approach it. Be firm but fair. Play the nice guy who just wants a solution, not shouty revenge man. Be clear your contract is with the dealer, the manufacturer is their problem not yours. If you can, start a claim early in the month, month end they'll be scrambling for numbers.
Andy