Page 2 of 2
Re: vespagt verses vespa px
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 8:47 pm
by barryG
LOL, I wouldnt worry about it.... just having a laugh.
Re: vespagt verses vespa px
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 3:42 am
by M.H.nexus500
andyscooter wrote:had a ride on a px yesterday
as much as i like it i got boring very quickly
i tested in a city centre so plenty of hills and stop starts ect ect
ride change up bit faster change up car pulls out slow down change down speed up change up set of light on red
change down stop
start change up faster change up hill change down speed up change up
so defenatly keeping the auto as i cant be arsed with it all
wait until LML bring out there auto version and you might re consider, especially if they bring out an auto version of their 200 injection version, or even the muted 225-250 engine which could be a possibility in the future
Re: vespagt verses vespa px
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 8:59 pm
by horobags
does the LML auto version have chocolate cranks as well.
Re: vespagt verses vespa px
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 11:12 pm
by Bluebottle
Hhhmmmm....chocolate cranks
I parked next to omne of those GTVs at Tescos, I liked the retro look of it and the headlight on the mudguard but I'll stick with my plastic fantastic
Re: vespagt verses vespa px
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:16 am
by martb4632
horobags wrote:does the LML auto version have chocolate cranks as well.
If they're 4 strokes they should be ok but yeah the crank on the 2t LML is a definite weak point. I had mine replaced with a better quality piaggio one under warranty & so far so good.
Daelim had an input on the new 4t LML engines and so far they seem to be far more reliable than the 2t (even if they dont sound or smell as nice )
Re: vespagt verses vespa px
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:56 pm
by M.H.nexus500
the autos they will be bringing out will be 4 strokes