Page 3 of 4
Re: Vultus Test
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 6:45 pm
by MrGrumpy
Motorcycle Monthly also have a test on their website...
http://www.morebikes.co.uk/2014-honda-vultus-review/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
It seems that whilst it isn't bad, the lack of practicality lets it down badly.
Re: Vultus Test
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 2:58 pm
by bikerdezzie
The tester has lost a lot of weight since leaving grange hill!
Re: Vultus Test
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:20 pm
by c4aok
It looks good on the angle shots but not on the road shots. Dn01 definitely prettier
Re: Vultus Test
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 10:13 pm
by Bluebottle
Sometimes it reminds me of the Yamaha Luxair Hybrid from 5 or 6 years ago
Re: Vultus Test
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2014 6:00 pm
by MrGrumpy
Bluebottle wrote:Sometimes it reminds me of the Yamaha Luxair Hybrid from 5 or 6 years ago
Actually, its a dead ringer for the Suzuki G-Stryder concept that appeared around 10 years ago!
Re: Vultus Test
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 12:59 pm
by irev
Both of whom featured a 'funny front end' specifically to reduce the effective headstock height - something which give the concepts a far greater homogeneity of line than the Vultus
Re: Vultus Test
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:40 pm
by johnp
I'd rather have the DN-01
Re: Vultus Test
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 8:44 pm
by gn2
I'd rather have a Guzzi V7 Stone or a Yamaha XV950R.
Re: Vultus Test
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 9:26 pm
by MrGrumpy
johnp wrote:I'd rather have the DN-01
Let alone that, I'm still looking for a reason why anyone would buy a Vultus instead of a NC700X, which is mechanically identical!
Re: Vultus Test
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 11:32 pm
by Ferret
looks cool ,reliable platform ,honda build quality but a stupid price tag .It will certainly get you noticed at a ride out .