
[BBvideo 560,340][/BBvideo]pikey wrote:The spine as it were is a steel box section thicker than other panels same principal as Honda cub they pinched the idea .
An education for you Mister Maxiscoot!

[BBvideo 560,340][/BBvideo]pikey wrote:The spine as it were is a steel box section thicker than other panels same principal as Honda cub they pinched the idea .
quite correct Pickeypikey wrote:We prefer the terms eco friendly and recyclable![]()
![]()
![]()
And hold their value, and easy to get parts for.gn2 wrote:They still look fabulous.maxiscoot nz wrote:Apart from nostalgia and the fact there was little else available in the 50,s and 60,s and they were leading technology then what is the reason in this day and age?
Plus they are light, agile, easy to maintain and very economical.
And fun.
Not entirely sure that value retention is any better or worse than other similar size scooters.Globs wrote:And hold their value, and easy to get parts for.
Actually, value retention is better than anything I have owned. The Vespas always retained more. Last one was a 2010, bought for £4,000 and sold almost three years later for £2950. That's pretty good really.gn2 wrote:
Not entirely sure that value retention is any better or worse than other similar size scooters.
DougL wrote:Actually, value retention is better than anything I have owned. The Vespas always retained more. Last one was a 2010, bought for £4,000 and sold almost three years later for £2950. That's pretty good really.gn2 wrote:
Not entirely sure that value retention is any better or worse than other similar size scooters.
I wasn't comparing Honda to Vespa/Piaggio, I was talking about the number of aftermarket parts for these bikes like racks etc. It puts the 300 into serious contention as a useful touring machine instead of a maxi IMO.gn2 wrote:Parts availability... I can get Honda parts delivered faster than a fast thing, so no real difference there either.