I'm not counting the fuel savings towards the swap money difference because whatever bike it is, i'll be paying extra to change as the next bike will be newer. I consider fuel savings to be a part of general maintenance/bills rather than purchase price.gn2 wrote: How much do you need to spend to swap scoots?
If it's £2740 you won't be saving any money on fuel till 2022....
Fair point, i think i was being optimistic to convince myself to be honestMrGrumpy wrote: 75mpg from a Burger 400 seems very optimistic to me, particularly commuting. Since your Tmax consumption is on the heavy side, I'd be very surprised if you got more than 60 from the Burger.
I don't think anything's wrong with the bike, it's got to be the riderDeeping wrote:You must be riding the tmax hard to get a return of only 48mpg or maybe there is something wrong with it.
It differs a lot what type of riding i'm doing. Looking at my fuelly stats, on a long run, my best mpg has been 65.5 which was on 0% city traffic and in a single run (july 2011). Even on a run with 20% city traffic, my mpg was 59.8 (may 2012). My worst was 44.2 (december 2010) and my overall average is 48.7mpg which is not bad considering i'm generally riding like a lunatic and commuting into london jungle.
I don't think i'd miss the sporty feeling on the tmax, although i can't tell until testing a burgman 400. I can only speak from my previous experience with burgman 650 which was a different beast altogether, and i can easily say i prefer it over the tmax, as i value comfort more than sportiness on a scooter. If i wanted the sporty feeling, i'd have bought a sports bikeMrGrumpy wrote: I've never ridden a 400 Burger, but I get the impression that are more of a touring scoot. The early ones at least didn't handle that well apparently - since the underlying engineering is rather basic, they had that hinged in the middle feeling. Personally, I suspect I would really miss the sharp handling and feel of the Tmax too much to really consider a 400 Burger - even if they are really comfortable, with loads of space and good weather protection. And of course, only 33bhp compared to the 45 or so of the TMax mk2-4.
But as you rightly say the power difference might cause a bit of a regret, so that's why i want to try one out on a long run to see how it accelerates and keeps to high speeds.
Thing is, from time to time i like giving a lesson to those sales reps with their bmws or boy racers, vans, whatever. Burgman 650 always used to feel capable in acceleration without giving me sweat. Tmax is also capable on 90% of the time but not as good as the burgman i feel. on the other hand, burgman 400 would be even less powerful, which might make it a bad choice in the end...
What else though? I surely don't want another tmax as they are too overpriced, burgman 650 i'd love to but my previous one dying due to a design fault scared me off any b650s that are pre 2008, which makes them too expensive as well.
i don't want to be spending more than £3500 and i don't want anything older than 2007-2008.
I toyed with the silverwing idea but i hate it's dashboard. b400's dashboard is another BIG selling point for me.




